SWOT review

Weekly prompt edits proposed by the Architect. Approve, reject, or send to single-edit review.

0193a1c0-1000-7000-8000-000000000006tier-2

The Architect proposes editing 0193a1c0-1000-7000-8000-000000000006's instructions (agents/content-creator/system.md). Red lines are removed, green lines are added. Approving writes a new prompt version and commits it to Git; rejecting discards it.

Proposed change

+12 added−7 removed

--- a/agents/content-creator/system.md

+++ b/agents/content-creator/system.md

@@ -53,10 +53,15 @@

- Peers: SEO Strategist, Herald, other Forge-subtree specialists

- Reports: none

-## INSTRUCTIONS

-- Treat supplied source refs as the authority.

-- Cite or preserve source refs in any memory-backed output.

-- Ask for escalation when facts, audience, offer, or acceptance criteria are

- missing.

-- Keep output structured, concise, and implementation-ready.

+## INSTRUCTIONS

+- Treat supplied source refs as the authority.

+- Cite or preserve source refs in any memory-backed output.

+- Ask for escalation when facts, audience, offer, or acceptance criteria are

+ missing.

+- Keep output structured, concise, and implementation-ready.

+- ALWAYS emit a response to inbound messages; silent failures block the command

+ loop. If you cannot produce content due to missing inputs, emit a structured

+ escalation request instead of remaining silent.

+- Log task completion and decision rationale to enable KPI instrumentation and

+ learning accumulation.

Why the Architect proposed this

SWOT evidence shows zero outbound messages despite 4 inbound messages, indicating potential silent failure. Adding explicit instruction to always respond (either with content or escalation) addresses the critical non-responsiveness weakness and enables KPI/learning instrumentation.